Best ScraperAPI Alternative in 2026: Structured Data Without CSS Selectors
ScraperAPI is solid if you want raw HTML at scale. But if your end goal is structured data , product names, prices, article metadata, contact info, JSON ready for your app , you'll still need to build a parser on top.
That is where Haunt API takes a different angle. Instead of returning just page source, it lets you describe what you want in plain English and gives you structured JSON back.
The short answer
| Feature | ScraperAPI | Haunt API |
|---|---|---|
| Free entry point | Usually trial-oriented | Free 100 req/mo |
| Pricing model | Monthly plans | £19/mo for 5,000 successful public-page requests |
| Returns structured JSON | No , usually HTML/response payload | Yes |
| Natural language extraction | No | Yes |
| Anti-bot fallback | Yes | Fallback where supported |
| Need to maintain selectors | Usually yes | No |
When ScraperAPI is the better choice
Let's be fair. If you already have:
- a mature scraper pipeline,
- CSS/XPath selectors you trust,
- parsers for each target site, and
- a team comfortable maintaining scraping infra,
then ScraperAPI is a perfectly reasonable fit. It solves browser/proxy pain and gives you page access.
Where Haunt wins
1. You need data, not markup
Most teams do not actually want HTML. They want a JSON object they can drop straight into a database, a dashboard, or an LLM pipeline.
POST /v1/extract
{
"url": "https://example.com/product/123",
"prompt": "Extract the product name, price, stock status, and main image URL"
}
{
"success": true,
"data": {
"product_name": "Noise-Cancelling Headphones",
"price": "$129.99",
"stock_status": "In stock",
"main_image_url": "https://..."
}
}
That cuts out a whole layer of brittle parser code.
2. Your target sites keep changing
Traditional scraping stacks break when HTML shifts. Haunt is much more forgiving because you're not hardcoding selectors for every page variation.
3. You want to move fast
If you're a solo founder, indie hacker, or small team, "one request, one JSON result" is a much nicer workflow than standing up browser pools and debugging selectors all weekend.
Rule of thumb: If your bottleneck is access, tools like ScraperAPI help. If your bottleneck is turning pages into useful structured data, Haunt is the stronger fit.
What the setup looks like
ScraperAPI-style workflow
- Fetch the page
- Parse the HTML
- Write selectors
- Handle missing fields and layout changes
- Maintain that parser forever
Haunt workflow
- Send a URL
- Describe what you want
- Get JSON back
Pricing philosophy matters too
Monthly subscriptions are fine once usage is steady, but the entry plan still needs to feel sane. Haunt's model is deliberately simple:
- Free: 100 requests free each month
- Starter: £19/month for 5,000 successful public-page requests
- Pro: £49/month for 25,000 successful requests and authenticated extraction
No credit multipliers, and no automatic overage billing.
Final verdict
If you want a raw web access layer, ScraperAPI still makes sense. If you want structured data extraction with minimal setup, Haunt is the better ScraperAPI alternative.
Try Haunt on a real target page tonight.
Start free with 100 requests. No card. Just send a URL and tell it what to extract. If it works, Starter gives you 5,000 successful requests/month.
Get a free Haunt API keyTurn a live page into structured JSON.
Use Haunt when selectors start lying to you.