field note

Best ScraperAPI Alternative in 2026: Structured Data Without CSS Selectors

April 2026 · 6 min read

ScraperAPI is solid if you want raw HTML at scale. But if your end goal is structured data , product names, prices, article metadata, contact info, JSON ready for your app , you'll still need to build a parser on top.

That is where Haunt API takes a different angle. Instead of returning just page source, it lets you describe what you want in plain English and gives you structured JSON back.

The short answer

Feature ScraperAPI Haunt API
Free entry point Usually trial-oriented Free 100 req/mo
Pricing model Monthly plans £19/mo for 5,000 successful public-page requests
Returns structured JSON No , usually HTML/response payload Yes
Natural language extraction No Yes
Anti-bot fallback Yes Fallback where supported
Need to maintain selectors Usually yes No

When ScraperAPI is the better choice

Let's be fair. If you already have:

  • a mature scraper pipeline,
  • CSS/XPath selectors you trust,
  • parsers for each target site, and
  • a team comfortable maintaining scraping infra,

then ScraperAPI is a perfectly reasonable fit. It solves browser/proxy pain and gives you page access.

Where Haunt wins

1. You need data, not markup

Most teams do not actually want HTML. They want a JSON object they can drop straight into a database, a dashboard, or an LLM pipeline.

POST /v1/extract
{
  "url": "https://example.com/product/123",
  "prompt": "Extract the product name, price, stock status, and main image URL"
}

{
  "success": true,
  "data": {
    "product_name": "Noise-Cancelling Headphones",
    "price": "$129.99",
    "stock_status": "In stock",
    "main_image_url": "https://..."
  }
}

That cuts out a whole layer of brittle parser code.

2. Your target sites keep changing

Traditional scraping stacks break when HTML shifts. Haunt is much more forgiving because you're not hardcoding selectors for every page variation.

3. You want to move fast

If you're a solo founder, indie hacker, or small team, "one request, one JSON result" is a much nicer workflow than standing up browser pools and debugging selectors all weekend.

Rule of thumb: If your bottleneck is access, tools like ScraperAPI help. If your bottleneck is turning pages into useful structured data, Haunt is the stronger fit.

What the setup looks like

ScraperAPI-style workflow

  • Fetch the page
  • Parse the HTML
  • Write selectors
  • Handle missing fields and layout changes
  • Maintain that parser forever

Haunt workflow

  • Send a URL
  • Describe what you want
  • Get JSON back

Pricing philosophy matters too

Monthly subscriptions are fine once usage is steady, but the entry plan still needs to feel sane. Haunt's model is deliberately simple:

  • Free: 100 requests free each month
  • Starter: £19/month for 5,000 successful public-page requests
  • Pro: £49/month for 25,000 successful requests and authenticated extraction

No credit multipliers, and no automatic overage billing.

Final verdict

If you want a raw web access layer, ScraperAPI still makes sense. If you want structured data extraction with minimal setup, Haunt is the better ScraperAPI alternative.

Try Haunt on a real target page tonight.

Start free with 100 requests. No card. Just send a URL and tell it what to extract. If it works, Starter gives you 5,000 successful requests/month.

Get a free Haunt API key
next scan

Turn a live page into structured JSON.

Use Haunt when selectors start lying to you.